<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dealing with cXML based messages in BizTalk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardhallgren.com/dealing-with-cxml-based-messages-in-biztalk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardhallgren.com/dealing-with-cxml-based-messages-in-biztalk/</link>
	<description>.NET, BizTalk and integration focused scribbles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:09:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nirav</title>
		<link>http://www.richardhallgren.com/dealing-with-cxml-based-messages-in-biztalk/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Nirav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardhallgren.com/?p=251#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Richard,

I have used same xsd  for validating example xml comes with cXML but my validator serves me an error, I will really thankfull to you if you can share your xsd to save my time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>I have used same xsd  for validating example xml comes with cXML but my validator serves me an error, I will really thankfull to you if you can share your xsd to save my time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardhallgren.com/dealing-with-cxml-based-messages-in-biztalk/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardhallgren.com/?p=251#comment-150</guid>
		<description>@Yossi: Great comment. I considered that but in this case I know the message size and I have a rough idea of the volume that I&#039;ll receive. Based on that I decided to make it as simple as possible for now. If I however should be fully able to reuse this in &lt;b&gt;any&lt;/b&gt; scenario I really should try and get to that. That&#039;ll be my next post ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yossi: Great comment. I considered that but in this case I know the message size and I have a rough idea of the volume that I&#8217;ll receive. Based on that I decided to make it as simple as possible for now. If I however should be fully able to reuse this in <b>any</b> scenario I really should try and get to that. That&#8217;ll be my next post <img src='http://www.richardhallgren.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yossi Dahan</title>
		<link>http://www.richardhallgren.com/dealing-with-cxml-based-messages-in-biztalk/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Yossi Dahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardhallgren.com/?p=251#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard, great post.

The only thing I would say, at the risk of stating the obvious, is that the code you&#039;ve posted reads the entire message to memory in order to run the regex to remove the DTD declaration.

This is not necessarily a problem for small messages, or for a low volume of messages, but is not best practice.

It might be worth taking the extra day or two it should take to write it in a streaming fashion so that you don&#039;t actually have to read the message at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard, great post.</p>
<p>The only thing I would say, at the risk of stating the obvious, is that the code you&#8217;ve posted reads the entire message to memory in order to run the regex to remove the DTD declaration.</p>
<p>This is not necessarily a problem for small messages, or for a low volume of messages, but is not best practice.</p>
<p>It might be worth taking the extra day or two it should take to write it in a streaming fashion so that you don&#8217;t actually have to read the message at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardhallgren.com/dealing-with-cxml-based-messages-in-biztalk/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardhallgren.com/?p=251#comment-152</guid>
		<description>@Nick: Yes, it&#039;s very strange they haven&#039;t updated that. Your work saved me many hours. Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nick: Yes, it&#8217;s very strange they haven&#8217;t updated that. Your work saved me many hours. Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Heppleston</title>
		<link>http://www.richardhallgren.com/dealing-with-cxml-based-messages-in-biztalk/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Heppleston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardhallgren.com/?p=251#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Hey Richard, pleased that the cXML schema was of use - your scenario was exactly why I added the schemas to my website (I&#039;m actually quite surprised that the cXML working group haven&#039;t released a cXML XSD, given that DTD&#039;s are now depreciated).

Nick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Richard, pleased that the cXML schema was of use &#8211; your scenario was exactly why I added the schemas to my website (I&#8217;m actually quite surprised that the cXML working group haven&#8217;t released a cXML XSD, given that DTD&#8217;s are now depreciated).</p>
<p>Nick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
